The real state of safety maturity, AI readiness, and what leaders urgently want next.
Introduction
At PSQUA 2025, QUASR+ had the opportunity to engage with more than 300 healthcare leaders, clinicians, and quality teams across the Philippines. From our main-stage presentation to candid conversations at our booth, one thing became clear:
Patient safety is at a turning point — but most hospitals are not ready for what comes next.
To understand this shift better, we ran a live survey during our presentation and collected insights from the leaders who visited our booth. The responses revealed a candid; unfiltered reality of what healthcare systems are struggling with today — and what they expect from the next wave of AI-driven patient safety solutions.
This article summarises the key findings and what they mean for the future of patient safety.
1. Hospitals Know They’re Still Reactive — Not Predictive
When asked how confident leaders were about proactively identifying safety risks before incidents occur, the results were striking:
- 18% said they were “very confident”
- 82% admitted they are still reactive
This lines up almost exactly with what regional leaders told us in our earlier executive webinar — patient safety remains largely retrospective, reliant on manual reporting and backward-looking analysis.
The takeaway:
Hospitals want to get ahead of harm but lack the tools, time, and data visibility to do it.
2. The Real Barrier Isn’t Data — It’s the Capacity to Use It
Our live poll revealed the top blockers:
- Manual workload / low bandwidth – 39%
- Poor data quality / incomplete reporting – 29%
- Lack of analytical tools – 20%
- Culture & engagement – 12%
Despite collecting hundreds of reports every year, teams struggle to convert them into actionable insights. Quality teams repeatedly shared:
“We collect the data. We just don’t have the time to learn from it.”
This validates a systemic gap: incident reporting systems were built for documentation, not learning.
3. AI Excites Healthcare Teams — But Trust Is the Deciding Factor
When we asked about their biggest hesitation in adopting AI:
- Cost & complexity – 39%
- Data privacy & security – 37%
- Regulatory uncertainty – 13%
- Staff trust in AI recommendations – 11%
This mirrors what hospital leaders told us at the booth almost word-for-word:
- “Where is the data stored?”
- “Can QUASR+ be hacked?”
- “Are your engineers based locally?”
- “Will AI make wrong decisions without us knowing?”
- “Can this be audited?”
Implication:
AI will only scale in patient safety if trust, transparency, and explainability come first.
4. What Leaders Actually Want From AI
Despite the hesitations, the audience was clear about where AI can create the most impact:
- Predicting emerging risks – 44%
- Summarizing incident narratives – 31%
- Automating RCA – 15%
- Reducing reporting workload – 10%
This aligns directly with QUASR+’s core capabilities:
- AI summarisation
- Pattern detection
- Predictive risk scoring
- Smart recommendations
Leaders don’t want more dashboards or prettier reports.
They want intelligence. They want foresight.
5. A Generational Divide Is Slowing Down Adoption (But Also Creating Urgency)
One of the most surprising observations came from your booth team:
- Younger hospital staff were excited about AI tools
- Senior executives (MDs, department heads, presidents) were hesitant or unfamiliar even with basic digital systems
This mismatch is a real-world adoption barrier.
But it also signals an inflection point:
The next generation of healthcare workers expects intelligent systems — not manual ones.
Hospitals will eventually need to modernize simply to retain their workforce.
6. What These Insights Mean for the Future
From all conversations and survey data, three realities emerged:
Reality 1 — AI is no longer optional
Hospitals are collecting too much data to rely on manual analysis.
Reality 2 — Trust is the new differentiator
The winning AI systems will be:
- Transparent
- Traceable
- Governed
- Secure
- Human-Centred
Reality 3 — Hospitals want ROI, not hype
They want:
- Faster reviews
- Less paperwork
- Predictive intelligence
- Practical improvements
Not abstract algorithms.
Conclusion: PSQUA Was a Turning Point
The enthusiasm at PSQUA was unmistakable. QUASR+ resonated strongly with clinicians, quality teams, and hospital leaders because it addresses the exact pain points the industry has been struggling with for years.
And while challenges remain cultural resistance, trust barriers, data privacy concerns the direction is clear:
Patient safety is shifting from reactive reporting to predictive prevention.
And AI is the engine that will drive that shift.
Request QUASR+ Early Access
