Patient safety hinges on accurate patient identification. Misidentification is a persistent and serious concern that can trigger a cascade of clinical errors, leading to significant patient harm. Addressing this issue is paramount for enhancing safety and preventing adverse events.
This article explores common patient identification errors, real-life examples, underlying systemic issues, and the critical role of incident reporting in preventing these mistakes.
Table of Contents
Common Patient Identification Errors
Patient misidentification can manifest in various ways across healthcare settings, jeopardizing patient safety and care quality. Key error types include:
- Name confusion: Similar or identical names, misspellings, or misunderstandings can lead to patient mix-ups.
- Wristband errors: Incorrect information on patient wristbands, such as name, date of birth, or medical record number, can result in errors during treatment or procedures.
- Registration errors: Inaccurate data entry during patient registration can lead to misidentification.
- Failure to verify identity: Lack of proper identity confirmation before administering treatments, medications, or procedures.
- Medication administration errors: Incorrect medication orders due to protocol lapses, batch checking, or barcode system malfunctions. Outpatient settings may have less stringent ID verification.
- Handoff and transfer errors: Miscommunication or misunderstanding during patient handoffs or transfers between departments or facilities can cause errors in patient identification.
- Duplicate records or EHR errors: Duplicate medical records for the same patient can lead to fragmented or incomplete information and potential errors in care delivery. Mistakes in electronic health record systems, such as selecting the wrong patient profile, can cause misidentification.
Patient Misidentification Cases
Despite ongoing efforts to address patient identification errors, incidents on wrong-patient continue to occur. Below are five real-life examples of patient misidentification and their consequences. Each incident caused harm to patients and triggered systemic changes aimed at preventing future errors and improving overall patient safety.
- Wrong-Patient Surgery: A Devastating Error
A patient, scheduled for a minor procedure, was mistakenly identified and underwent a major surgery intended for another patient. The error was discovered only after the initial incision was made. This severe mistake resulted in significant physical trauma, prolonged hospitalization, and corrective surgery. The hospital faced legal consequences and had to implement stricter ID verification protocols to prevent such errors in the future. - Medication Mishap: Severe Allergic Reaction
In an emergency room, a patient received medication meant for another patient with a different condition. The medication triggered a severe allergic reaction, requiring intensive care treatment and a prolonged recovery period. This incident highlighted the need for better wristband designs and standardized verification processes, leading to changes in the hospital’s patient ID protocols. - Blood Transfusion Tragedy: Organ Failure
Two patients with similar names were admitted simultaneously in a trauma center. Due to a clerical error, one patient received a blood transfusion intended for another, leading to a severe immune response. The error resulted in critical health complications, including organ failure, and requiring long-term medical care. The hospital had to revise its patient identification systems and implement biometric identification after this incident. - Diagnostic Confusion: Duplicate Records Impact
In a primary care facility, duplicate records in an electronic health system led to a patient being misdiagnosed and receiving unnecessary treatment. This incident highlighted the need for advanced health IT solutions with real-time alerts to ensure record accuracy, leading to an EHR system upgrade by the primary care facility. - Pediatric Error: Incorrect Vaccinations
A pediatric patient was mistaken for another child with a similar name, resulting in the administration of incorrect vaccinations. This error put the child at risk and required immediate intervention to mitigate potential harm. The healthcare provider faced significant backlash from the community and had to take steps to improve safety, including enhanced training programs for staff, emphasizing the importance of patient ID protocols and fostering a culture of safety.
Underlying Systemic Weaknesses
Patient identification errors often stem from systemic weaknesses, not solely human error. These weaknesses include:
- Lack of clear patient identification policies: Inconsistent processes across departments or facilities increase error likelihood. Standardized policies, processes, and regular safety practice reviews are essential.
- Poor wristband design and usability: Wristbands are critical for patient identification confirmation, particularly for young and incapacitated patients (e.g. sedated patients in the operating room). Illegible, degraded, or poorly designed wristbands hinder accurate identification.
- Staff fatigue, distractions, and time constraints: Fatigue, distractions, and time pressures contribute to errors. Safe working environments, adequate staffing, and efficient workflows are crucial.
- Ineffective interdepartmental communication: Poor communication during patient transfers, particularly in high-risk areas like the ER and CT suite, increases misidentification risks.
- Inadequate staff training and safety awareness: Non-compliance with protocols often indicates insufficient training and safety awareness.
- Technological failures: Malfunctioning or inadequate technology, such as barcode scanners or EHR systems, can contribute to errors.
Addressing these systemic issues requires a comprehensive, integrated approach, not fragmented solutions.
The Cascading Effect of Errors
Another important point to note is patient identification errors can trigger a series of harmful clinical incidents. When health workers fail to promptly discover that a patient is wrongly identified, it can lead to multiple errors. Listed below are examples of how incorrect patient identification has cascading effect leading to patient harm.
- Medication errors: Incorrect patient ID may result in administering medications intended for one patient to another. This can lead to adverse drug reactions.
- Misdiagnosis and treatment errors: If health workers do not correctly identify patients, they may make errors in diagnosis and treatment plans. This can result in unnecessary procedures, delays in appropriate treatment, or even incorrect treatments being administered.
- Incorrect procedures: Patient mismatch can lead to performing procedures on the wrong patient or the wrong body part. This can result in unnecessary harm to patients and additional procedures to correct the mistakes.
- Transfusion errors: In situations where blood transfusions are required, failure to correctly identify the patient can result in transfusing the wrong blood type or blood product, leading to severe complications including hemolytic reactions.
The Role of Incident Reporting
Incident reporting is crucial for preventing patient ID mismatches and enhancing safety. It systematically captures, analyzes, and addresses errors to prevent recurrence. Here’s how it helps with patient ID issues:
- Early detection of errors
Reporting on patient ID incidents and near misses allows your organization to identify and document instances of patient mismatches as soon as they occur. This early detection can alert the Quality Management team to intervene promptly and take corrective actions. - Investigation and root cause analysis
After an incident is reported, the Quality Management team investigates and performs RCA to determine factors contributing to the patient ID error. This analysis helps to identify the root cause and reveal systemic issues, such as the absence of clear policies, inadequate processes, lack of staff training, or technological shortcomings. - Process and quality improvement initiatives
Information gathered from incident reports and root cause analysis can be applied to enhance processes and procedures related to patient identification. This may include adopting new technologies, revising policies, optimizing processes, offering further staff training, and involving patients and their families. - Raising safety awareness
Encouraging staff to report patient ID incidents and near misses can boost safety awareness. A positive safety culture is crucial for a successful patient ID program. Incident data can identify areas where staff need more training on patient ID protocols. - Technological enhancements
Incident reports are instrumental in highlighting concerns regarding the use of technology in patient identification. It is crucial to ensure the safe implementation of patient care technology to prevent wrong-patient errors, while simultaneously addressing its limitations. Analyzing incident trends can motivate healthcare organizations to adopt strategies aimed at enhancing the usability of health IT systems and reducing the risk of human errors.
Summary
Correctly identifying patients at every step of the care process is vital for patient safety, and the consequence of patient misidentification can be severe and costly. Attributing errors solely to human factors overlooks underlying systemic weaknesses. Healthcare leaders must adopt comprehensive strategies, including robust incident reporting, to address these challenges and ensure patient safety.
Related blog: Patient Identification – Strategies and Best Practices
Free Download: QUASR Patient Identification Incident Form
QUASR is a cloud-based healthcare incident reporting system. It offers functionalities that encourage Patient Identification Error reporting, facilitate collaboration, enable analysis, and track actions.
Click the link below to download!
