Active participation is an essential ingredient of all successful systems. Incident or Risk management is no exception to this. In this article, we understand why active staff participation is critical to all successful implementations. We will also explore a few ideas on how you can leverage this in your systems as well. Lastly, we add a note on how QUASR achieves this for you in the Incident Management space.
Active participation, we define, is the level of engagement users have with a system. In an incident management system, this can be the familiarity and comfort that users have to report an incident or an issue using the system. In common parlance, there are metrics like daily active users (DAU) or monthly active users (MAU) used to define how successful a software system is. However, in Incident or Risk management systems, these metrics are not very useful indicators. We measure participation as the willingness to interact with the application for these cases.
Interestingly, the only way to unlock the full potential of an incident or risk management system is by optimizing for high DAU. We need all the staff to play their role in ensuring incidents are handled with sufficient detail to ensure they don’t occur again. Except, this is not something that the software provider can manage. The organization needs to facilitate and encourage this as part of its culture.
Factors Affecting Participation
A common problem with most enterprise systems is the user attitude to the system. Multiple factors influence the user perception of the system: organizational stand on the system; hierarchy and their position within that; whether the system feels intimidating; and how welcome they feel when they do participate in the process. For an incident management system, however, a lack of active participation results in poor outcomes. If the system does not capture as many incidents as possible, the organization cannot improve its safety process. Or if the incidents reported are not analyzed, investigated, and brought to a closure in a timely fashion – again, the organization cannot improve its safety process. In both these cases, the problem might be that users are not playing the role required to ensure the overall success of the process.
Secondly, incidents are not the domain of any particular staff of a hospital. For instance, caregiving is exclusive to doctors or nursing staff, just as dispensing is exclusive to pharmacy staff. But when an incident occurs, everyone from the nursing staff, pharmacy staff to janitorial staff, and service providers that are peripheral to the organization have an essential role to play — report the incident and help in whatever way they can to ensure a smooth closure and learning from the incident.
Investigation of an incident or its root cause analysis is a group activity. In many cases, each hospital has its designated and identified experts at running this activity. Despite their expertise, the investigation staff cannot conduct a productive root cause analysis if the staff who understand the incident or the process do not come forward with their viewpoints and suggestions. Often, though, staff might quickly feel intimidated to participate amidst experts and refrain from voicing their opinions. Users on the ground may have a slightly different perspective of the issue and have important insights. Their lack of participation denies the organization a chance at improving the process!
Similarly, staff should not feel like they are “on the hook” for their participation. The environment to encourage participation is very forgiving and open in nature. The management usually needs to step up, ensure a safe space for all their staff, and encourage them to do the right thing. From the perspective of patient and worker safety, the only way forward is inclusive of all stakeholders.
Lastly, an overlooked reason for the lack of participation is that the user interface is very complicated and intimidating to use. When the quality or risk management teams implement a digital solution to their process, they are often focused on the process and forget the importance of keeping things simple. As the understanding goes, it is pretty complicated to design a simple system and is quite simple to design a complicated one. When designing a system, we often optimize for the results and impacts but fail to account for ease of use; users need to participate actively to achieve the results.
How Does QUASR Achieve This For You?
A core tenet in the design of QUASR is user participation. QUASR builds on the best practices commonly used elsewhere in the software industry. Our user interface and usability are very similar to hugely popular apps like Facebook or Gmail. Similarity with other popular applications helps us leverage the familiarity that the users already have.
Secondly, QUASR brings multiple simple but niche features like save draft, multi-stage forms, flags, and widgets to simplify how a user sets to achieve their tasks in the incident. Further, we have features like pseudo-anonymity to encourage participation without fear of repercussions. The list is exhaustive, and covering them all would become a blog post on its own. Feel free to talk to us to understand how you can benefit from using QUASR in your organization.
QUASR results from a decade-long experience working in the incident and risk management space across industries. Through that experience, we saw the specific difficulties that the healthcare industry suffered from using generic products altered to suit their needs. We didn’t want to be presumptuous either. So we spoke to many industry leaders across the region, of hospitals of different sizes, and across roles and functions. One common feedback we received early on was the need for “anonymous reporting”.
As the name suggests, anonymous reporting is when an incident report is not attached to any particular user/staff in the system. Many hospitals felt the need for such a system to ensure more participation from all staff. While every hospital works very hard to provide a safe space for all its staff, fear is irrational. While the purpose ofincident reporting and management is to improve organizational quality and safety, it isn’t easy to convince their staff that reporting an incident will not lead to repercussions.
Generally, anonymous reporting is employed only for whistle-blowing. And whistle-blowing is typically associated with grave issues in the organization. Incidents, on the other hand, whether grave or silly, are valuable sources of lessons and improvements for the organization. Secondly, coming from a computing background, we understand that genuinely anonymous is somewhat difficult to guarantee. It is usually possible to narrow it down to a small list of people! But not everyone realizes this. So we did not want to design a solution that would potentially blindside a staff. After all, the only guaranteed way to drive away any fear of repercussions is to build trust.
The other problem with anonymous reporting is: we cannot enable many user-friendly and time-saver features like multi-stage captures, draft retrievals, and the like. We are forcing the user to fill in a, typically, long incident form in a single sitting. Hospital staff are usually amongst the most time-crunched workers ever. Expecting them to block off time to report incidents will deter them from actually reporting any minor or near-miss incidents at all. For the organization, though, the near-miss or minor incidents are where the wealth of inputs are lost. Additionally, the quality managers and investigation teams do not have any starting point for conducting further assessments on the incidents — assuming they do not know who reported the incident.
At QUASR, we aren’t thrilled with anonymous reporting. We strongly feel that making incident reporting anonymous does not enable our customers with the right tools to improve their overall culture. After many discussions internally and externally, we arrived at what we call the “pseudo-anonymous” reporting or the “Protect” feature. This feature is available as standard and out of the box for all our enterprise customers. Lite does not support this feature. For Basic, we will wait to hear from you before enabling support for this feature.
To report an incident in the pseudo-anonymous mode, the staff user must first log in to the system. The reported incident is internally attached to the user. However, QUASR will hide this information from most stakeholders of the incident. QUASR will show the reported user as “PROTECTED” instead of their actual name. This way, the user’s identity is protected from the rest of the system. We believe this enables them to report without any fear of repercussions.
Like we mentioned, this mode is not an anonymus reporting mode. Typically, only Quality Managers will have access to the reporting person’s identity. Accessing the identity ensures that the qualty teams can proceed to facilitate further investigations without much difficulty. Additionally, in places where a user trusts their supervisor, they can allow access to their supervisors. In most installations, only quality managers and optionally supervisors have access to the identity for protected incidents.
When users choose to report an incident with “protection” enabled, they have to read and understand their choice. There is an inline explanation of the behavior of the “protect” mode and allows the user to make a conscious choice. This additional step acts as a deterrent to using this mode unless necessary. We do not want the staff to abuse this option — even though it is not entirely anonymous, it does complicate the investigation process. It limits the options available to the quality management teams.
Advantages of Pseudo-Anonymous Reporting
The main advantages of pseudo-anonymous reporting or protected mode are as follows:
1. It allows users to report an incident without being anonymous and still protecting their identity from the larger group.
2. It enables quality management and investigation teams to perform meaningful analysis of the incident without revealing the reporting person’s identity. For anonymously reported incidents, it isn’t straightforward to get a significant investigation done from the report. Quality teams are left to make reasonable assumptions and proceed, which doesn’t lead to preferred outcomes.
3. It enables the organizations to set the right precedent in terms of their follow up actions to assure the staff that incident reporting does not lead to punitive measures.
Disadvantages of Pseudo-Anonymous Reporting
There are no silver bullets. And our solution is not without its limits. The main disadvantages of our approach are:
1. The stff must trust their quality managers to do the right thing. As we noted, this is not an easy task for the hospitals or the quality departments to achieve amongst all their staff.
2. Our solution targets Clinical incidents. However, many of our customers choose to track other incident categories as well. For a selection of HR-related issues, the pseudo-anonymous mode is not a good soluion. It might worsen the situation for the staff.
3. Some incidents need to be whistle-blown for real change to occur. These are usually severe issues within the organization that pervade the entire structure. Peudo-anonymous mode is not an answer to these types of problems.
Hypothetically, if you ask someone where you are likely to meet with an accident — in a hospital or while driving a car — most people will say hospitals are the most unlikely place to get injured.
Unfortunately, the actual medical situation is a bit different compared to a hypothetical situation. According to a 2015 study by the UK National Health Services (NHS), it is believed that 10% of critical accidents occur in all hospitals.
Even the World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that 20-40% of global healthcare spending goes waste due to poor quality of care. This poor healthcare quality leads to the death of more than138 million patients every year.
Patient safety in hospitals is in danger due to human errors and unsafe procedures. Everyone makes mistakes, even good doctors and nurses. However, by recording those errors, analyzing and following up, we can avoid the future occurrence of errors/accidents.
To err is human, they say. The best thing we can do as humans is to learn from these mistakes and avoid repeating them in the future. When we adopt this feedback approach in hospitals and other healthcare spaces, we can improve patient safety in healthcare.
Knowing why, when, and how to report an incident can help improve patients, hospital staff, and organizations’ safety. This guide will walk you through all the different aspects of incident reporting in healthcare. It will show how to file an accurate incident report to establish high healthcare standards worldwide.
What Does Incident Reporting in the Healthcare System Means?
To err is human, to cover up is unforgivable, and to fail to learn is inexcusable."
Prof Liam Donaldson (WHO Envoy for Patient Safety)
An incident is an unexpected event that affects patient or staff safety. The typical healthcare incidents are related to physical injuries, medical errors, equipment failure, administration, patient care, or others. In short, anything that endangers a patient’s or staff’s safety is called an incident in the medical system.
The process of collecting incident data and presenting it properly to action is known as ‘Incident Reporting in Healthcare.’ With incident reporting, an emerging problem is highlighted in a non-blaming way to root out the cause of the error or the contributing factors.
Designated staff with authority to file a report, or staff who has witnessed an incident firsthand, usually file the incident report. Usually, nurses or other hospital staff file the report within 24 to 48 hours after the incident occurred. The outcomes improve by recording incidents while the memories of the event are still fresh.
When To Write Incident Reports in Hospitals?
When an event results in an injury to a person or damage to property, incident reporting becomes a must. Unfortunately, for every medical error, almost 100 errors remain unreported. There are many reasons for unreported medical incidents, but not knowing when to report is one of the most common ones.
Unfortunately, many patients and hospital employees do not have a clear idea about which incidents to report. Knowing when to report in hospitals can boost safety standards to a great extent.
Let’s consider these situations:
✅ A nurse is helping a patient walk from his bed to the bathroom. However, he stubs the big toe on his left foot on the IV pole that he is dragging.
✅While injected the accident patient’s IV with pain medication, the nurse misread the label and administered a heavy dosage than prescribed, which increased the patient’s blood pressure level.
In these situations, it is necessary to fill in the incident reports. Simply because an unexpected event occurred and lead to harm, it doesn’t matter how severe or minor the incident is. It is essential to report all incidents.
Purpose of Incident Reports
Incident reports provide valuable information to hospital administration facilities. They capture data required to highlight necessary measures to improve the overall safety and quality of the hospital. An accurate incident report serves multiple purposes.
1. Root Cause Identification
All incidents have a cause. Mishaps are pretty uncommon in hospital settings, and most incidents can be root caused by a potential reason. Correcting the root causes can easily avoid future incidents of that type. In this sense, root cause analysis of an incident is an essential investigation step for all hospitals to ensure their staff and patients are safe under most conditions.
2. Policy and Process Improvements
Some incidents are part of a larger pattern that can only be identified by looking at them together – let’s say, for example, through a Swiss cheese analysis model. Such assessments usually identify more significant issues that aren’t immediately apparent from individual incident reports or investigations. These assessments feed into clinical risk management as well as help guide the hospital administrators to tweak their policy or process guidelines to help staff adhere to a safer care routine.
For example, let’s take a pattern of incidents. Each has a root cause individually to what looks like a handover issue – but at different stages or different type of facilities. It would be possible to tweak each of these handover processes individually to fix that specific issue. However, it may be more productive to improve the overall handover process by taking all the incidents as a whole and tweak to address them together.
3. Clinical Risk Management
All hospitals have and use their enterprise risk management processes. Clinical risk management, a subset of healthcare risk management, uses incident reports as essential data points. Risk management aims to ensure the hospital administrators know their institution’s performance and identify addressable issues that increase their exposure. And the ability to assess clinical risks ensures the hospitals can stay ahead in their business and provide high-quality care and a safe workplace for all staff.
4. Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
All hospitals have continuous improvement plans that help them stay updated with all the latest developments in patient safety and quality by assessing, evaluating, and improving their processes and methods over time. Having incident reports duly filled and followed up to closure helps the CQI process to identify potential areas of improvement and help the organization achieve a more successful CQI cycle that takes them forward.
5. Better Training and Continuous Learning
Incident data are essential sources of knowledge and on-the-job training material. Incident investigation is a rich source of information that will help new staff understand why the hospital has a specific process that may differ from their previous workplaces. Similarly, having a robust incident management system helps implement a good continuous learning program for the staff that helps them learn the most important details they need to be efficient in their day-to-day work.
Different Types of Incident Reporting in Healthcare
An incident is an unfavorable event in health organizations. But, the nature of the incident can vary based on numerous circumstantial factors. Broadly, there are three types of incident reports:
1. Clinical Incidents
A clinical incident is an unpleasant and unplanned event that causes or can cause physical harm to a patient. These incidents are harmful in nature; they can severely harm a person or damage the property.
● Nurse administered the wrong medication to the patient.
● Unintended retention of a foreign object in a patient after a surgery. ● Blood transfusion reaction.
2. Near Miss Incidents
Sometimes an error/unsafe condition is caught before it reaches the patient. Such incidents are called “near-miss” incidents. However, the problem might have diffused before the severe harm, but it is still essential to report near-miss incidents. Nearly 50 near-miss incidents occur for each injury reported.
● A nurse notices the bedrail is not up when the patient is asleep and fixes it.
● A checklist call caught an incorrect medicine dispensation before administration. ● A patient attempts to leave the facility before discharge, but the security guard stopped him and brought him back to the ward.
3. Non Clinical Incidents
Non-clinical incidents include events, incidents, and near-misses related to a failure or breach of EH&S, regardless of who is injured or involved.
● Misplaced documentation or documents were interchanged between patient files.
● A security mishap at a facility.
4. Workplace Incidents
A work accident, occupational incident, or accident at work is a discrete occurrence that can lead to physical or mental occupational injury. The workplace incidents are related to mental as well as physical hurts. According to the BLS’s Workplace Injuries and Illness News, nursing assistant jobs have the highest incidence rates.
● Patient or next-of-kin abuses a care provider – verbally or physically – leading to unsafe work conditions.
● A healthcare provider suffered a needle prick while disposing of a used needle.
Who Prepares Incident Reports in Healthcare Facilities?
At QUASR, we believe all staff (and patients, too) should be able to report incidents or potential incidents they have witnessed. But in practice, it is a bit different. Some hospitals have designated persons who are authorized to file the reports. In some other hospitals, the staff usually updates their supervisor about an incident, then can file the report.
QUASR clients, usually, have configured to give access to all their staff so that they can initiate an incident report enabling them to stay aware of all the issues that occur – however minor or inappropriate it may be. Allowing all staff to report requires a training effort from the quality and safety teams to ensure all the employees understand what and when to file an incident report
Critical Components of Incident Report
One comprehensive incident report should answer all the basic questions — who, what, where, when, and how. Most hospitals follow a preset reporting format based on their organizational needs. However, an incident report must cover the following aspects:
1. General Information
The well-informed incident report needs basic information such as the date and time of the incident. Additionally, for future analysis, your report must include general information.
2. Location of the Incident
Specifically, mention the location of the incident and the particular area within the property—for example, patient X fell in Ward no. 2 near the washroom. With the location specifications, administration staff can better investigate the reason behind the incident and fix it.
3. Concise yet Detailed Incident Description
The incident description needs to be clear and meaningful — don’t use vague language, never add baseless information, and keep personal biases out. Whenever you have to add your opinion to the report, mark it as an assumption or subjective opinion.
4. Type of the Incident
You should define the nature of the incident while reporting to get a clear view. We can categorize the hospital incidents into different sections such as Medication Error, Patient Fall, Equipment Damage, Abuse, Pressure Ulcer, Radiation, Surgery/Anesthesia, Laboratory related, Security, Harassment, Loss or damage to property, Patient Identification, among others. QUASR offers 25 such incident types built-in by default.
5. Information of all Parties Involved in the Incident
The administration needs the name and contact details of all the parties involved in the incident. The report should capture all the relevant information required to follow up with the involved parties.
6. Witness Testimonies
If there are witnesses available to the incident, it will be helpful to add their statements in your report. While writing witness statements, focus on the following attributes — specific details provided related to the incident, use quotation marks to frame their accounts, note witnesses’ location at the time of the incident, and how they are related to the incident.
7. Level of Injury
In case of injury, the reporting staff must record the injury level and cause in the report. If the incident involves an in-patient at the hospital, their medical records will reflect the treatment and diagnosis of the injury. However, for others, it might be required to follow up and record their injury diagnoses.
8. Follow Up
The incident report is incomplete without the follow-up action details. Each report should include remarks stating what preventive measurements and tactics you have opted to avoid such incidents in the future.
Once a final follow-up on the incident report is made, the next phase is reviewing. In this step, the supervisor or manager ensures the implementation of corrective actions against the report. The goal of the review is to prevent the recurrence of the incident and create immediate action plans. While reviewing incident reports, a reviewer should consider the following things:
SBAR abbreviates Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendations. The reporting person’s supervisor at the time of the incident typically performs SBAR. SBAR attempts to capture more structured information about the incident, what happened, pre-conditions leading to the incident, information about the patient or staff, if involved, a first assessment of what caused the incident, and recommendations for follow-up or corrective actions.
11. Risk Scoring
A risk score is a calculated number that reflects the severity of risk due to some factors. We compute risk scores as a factor of probability and impact. It is common in the industry to use a 5×5 risk scoring matrix. But there are other methods too, and sometimes the scoring changes based on the type and nature of the incident.
12. Investigation Information
An investigator or an investigation team needs to go through all the supporting evidence to analyze the incident. The incident supporting comes in different forms, such as photos, CCTV footage, and witness statements. It is essential to verify the supporting evidence during an investigation. Information investigation often leads to:
13. Root Cause Analysis
Root cause analysis is a problem-solving method used to identify the root cause of the problem. The typical output of the RCA step is a set of contributing factors that then indicate systemic issues that may be addressed together by policy or process changes.
Standard RCA tools used in the industry include the Five Why method, Ishikawa, or the Fishbone Analysis. Some cases use more advanced techniques like the Swiss cheese model or PRISMA.
14. Contributing Factors
Contributing factors are those factors that influenced a single event or multiple events to cause an incident. If contributing factors are accelerated, it will affect the severity of the consequences. Therefore, with the knowledge of contributing factors, management can eliminate them to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
QUASR implements a form of the London Protocol for capturing these factors.
15. Executive Summary
The compelling executive summary is the final step in reporting incidents. It is a short document produced for management purposes. It summarizes a more extended report so that readers can quickly become acquainted with the material. Management can get a crisp reading of the incident from the executive summaries without reading the entire report.
Benefits of Hospital Incident Reporting
Through healthcare data analysis, setting the correct key performance indicators in your organization becomes simpler. Here are some vital benefits that you can gain from reporting.
1. Preventive Measures
One of the most powerful elements of an incident report is streamlining historical and current data to spot potential incidents in advance. Using predictive analysis, healthcare facilities can improve the quality of patient care and reduce workplace mishaps. Around 60% of healthcare leaders have confirmed that adopting predictive analytics has improved their efficiency considerably.
2. Disease Monitoring
Disease monitoring is one aspect of the first predictive analytics. With the incident reports, healthcare organizations can monitor potential disease outbreaks by using past and present metrics.
During COVID-19, many hospitals have struggled to prevent disease outbreaks on their premises. But, the organizations that have insightful data with them may have managed the pandemic outbreak a lot easier.
3. Cost Reduction
Reporting can also make healthcare operations more economically effective. By gathering and analyzing incident data daily, hospitals’ can keep themselves out of legal troubles. A comprehensive medical error study compared 17 Southeastern Asian countries’ medical and examined how poor reporting increases the financial burden on healthcare facilities.
4. Enhanced Patient Safety
Improving patient safety is the ultimate goal of incident reporting. From enhancing safety standards to reducing medical errors, incident reporting helps create a sustainable environment for your patients. Eventually, when your hospital offers high-quality patient care, it will build a brand of goodwill.
Healthcare Incident Reporting Challenges
Healthcare incident reporting has various managerial and safety-related benefits. To create a result-driven incident report, you have to cross the next hurdles also:
1. Paper-based Reporting
In this technology era, many healthcare organizations still rely upon traditional paper-based reporting. Paper-based reporting is a manual approach where the incident details are recorded and managed using paper and often hand-written reports.
Paper-based reporting has numerous disadvantages, including low-quality data, limited flexibility, costly process, error-prone, time-consuming, and more. Get started digitizing your incident data by downloading our Excel-based Incident Reporting Template and quickly replace paper-based reporting. We even have a post explaining the template and how you can benefit from it.
The problem of underreporting is widespread in the healthcare industry. Common causes of underreporting include:
1) Lack of awareness about when and what to report.
2) Fear of repercussions from colleagues or seniors.
The reason behind underreporting might vary, but no one can deny that it is the biggest reporting challenge. We had written a detailed article on our assessment of under-reporting in our blog. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, all healthcare facilities should offer a simple and anonymous reporting way to their staff. QUASR has built-in features to encourage reporting in a pseudo-anonymous manner encouraging staff to file a report without fear.
3. Busy Schedule
The busiest hospital personnel, nurses, and doctors are mainly responsible for filing incident reports. Due to their busy and often overworked schedule, they sometimes fail to report incidents. A solution must factor in this constraint at the time of design and implementation to ensure all incidents are recorded in a timely fashion without over-burdening the staff.
After understanding the purpose, benefits, and challenges of incident reporting in healthcare, it is clear that reporting is essential for medical facilities. Whether you wish to improve patient safety or reduce workplace mishaps, incident reporting can serve multiple purposes. But, compiling, reviewing, and investigating incidents in a timely and unbiased fashion isn’t a simple task.
You require an automatic incident reporting system to manage hundreds of incidents at any given time. We can say that QUASR has practical tools to help you create track-analyze incident reports. QUASR is easy to use and access, which allows fast and accurate incident reporting.
We have various elements in our software for resilient healthcare incident reporting ensuring all the best practices. To better understand what QUASR can do for you,book a free demo today.
Also, please stay connected with us as we will be covering more topics related to digitalized incident reporting.
Meanwhile, feel free tocontact us for further information!
Amy had been a staff nurse in the same hospital for 30 years. Her shift starts with making rounds in different 15 wards and ensuring they follow all the patient safety protocols.
One day she found water on the Ward No. 3 floor due to the cleaning staff’s negligence. Despite noticing this issue, she keeps on moving with her job.
Her reasons to not report the problem were:
– Reporting meant lots of paperwork
– Reporting could put her hours behind schedule
– She had to waste time on hearing back from the admin department
– Importantly, she doesn’t want to cause any trouble to the poor cleaning staff
So, she didn’t report at that time, and the issue remained unresolved. After a few days, some patients fall from the wet floor in the ward. Now patient falls are serious. And it doesn’t look good if the investigation reveals negligence. So, they go unreported as well!
The result? The hospital continues to score poor safety results. The reason for not reporting could be credible or just laziness. Under-reporting doesn’t help the organization meet its safety goals. The story above is not an isolated story of anyone hospital or nurse.
Statistics tell us that this seems to be the norm:
– Almost 25% of incidents go unreported. (Source: Sentis)
– Around 100 errors go unreported while recording. (Source: Pharmacy Times)
– Every year about 7,150 deaths occurred due to not reporting incidents in hospitals.(Source: Yale News)
– The Journal of Patient Safety]] suggested in 2013 that 440,000 people per year die from preventable medical errors. (Source: Medscape)
Even though we have data indicating under-reporting in hospitals, not many practitioners follow the proper reporting process. QUASR tries to address this issue with simple tools that seek to address common reasons for under-reporting. Let us first understand Under-reporting and its Reasons.
What is Under-reporting?
Under-reporting means an issue, incident, or the fact that an individual or organization has not reported. Under-reporting is a failure in data gathering.
In hospitals, sometimes individual staff hide or don’t report some incidents. However, unfortunately, it is not possible to know ahead of time how these under-reported incidents affect long-term patient safety.
Recently a study published in theStanford Business on how hospitals acquired infections is reported in Medicare claims. Researchers found that hospitals with lighter reporting requirements were more miscoded by examining hundreds of Medicare patients, as hospital-acquired infections(HAIs) were presented on admission (POAs). 18.5% of infections said to present upon admission were acquired in the hospital.
Overall, under-reporting is a critical issue that should be analyzed and treated by the hospitals on priority.
4 Reasons Behind Under-reporting in Hospitals
There are plenty of different reasons that generate under-reporting problems in hospitals worldwide. Some of the common underreporting causes in hospitals are:
Fear of Repercussion
One of the most common reasons why an incident goes unreported is a fear of repercussion. We don’t think there are any organizations in today’s day and age where an employee is penalized for taking the initiative.
Still, many staff that we have met on and off have mentioned that they are afraid it will reflect poorly on them if they reported an issue. Organizations may have to do more to ensure that an incident is not a reflection of the staff. From our discussions with our clients, this is often amongst the top few reasons why incidents go unreported.
No Time To Report
Staff on the floor are amongst the busiest people we meet on a given day. Incident reporting in such a dynamic is quite tricky. Most incident forms are lengthy and require the staff to write up in sufficient detail, then participate in multiple investigation sessions to complete the incident report.
Often incident reports have to be filed within a predetermined number of hours since the incident occurred. If they cannot do this, they usually forget and don’t get around to filing the same. It is especially true for incidents that don’t cause any harm to the patients as such since everyone’s priority is patient safety and care.
Hospital staff often do not have time, and hence they may tend to ignore incidents that they believe are not serious enough. Lack of time is also one of the top reasons why under-reporting occurs, based on our discussions with our clients.
Lack of Transparency
Often the reporting person is wholly left out of the incident processing loop. Many organizations have a perfect reason to do this for some types of incidents too. But some processes are not designed to be transparent at all. The process leaves many people out, and they don’t understand how their reporting an incident helped the organization or patient benefit. This can also lead the staff to believe that their incident report went into some “filing black hole”, and no one even had a chance to process their report.
It is possible to revise the incident process to be more transparent when it is digitalized. A digital system allows for frequent and early feedback to all the stakeholders. By being transparent, the system becomes more inclusive of all staff and helps them realize the value of their contribution.
Insufficient Trainin or Knowledge
Many healthcare institutions are unaware of the fact that theirincident reporting system isn’t transparent. Not many hospital staff members know when, how and whom to report. The lack of reporting knowledge occurs due to poor communication.
Most hospitals would share this information with their new workers during the orientation and training process. But learning occurs differently to different people. Often, a single knowledge sharing session is insufficient to orient all the users in the processes.
Additionally, organizations share critical information via email. Frontline workers like nurses or ward attendants don’t have regular access to a computer to receive information on time.
The only way to address this is continuous training or frequent sessions to help the staff get oriented to new systems better. The other often ignored method is to build intuitive systems.
How does QUASR help you address under-reporting
QUASR has a suite of nifty tools integrated into the system to help address under-reporting. For instance, to specifically address the fear of repercussions, QUASR uses a novel pseudo-anonymous reporting that allows users to hide their identity at the time of reporting. We do this so that the users will feel safe reporting, but at the same time, the Quality Managers don’t have to deal with insufficient data for investigation later on.
Similarly, we use a multi-stage questionnaire for collecting the details with the ability to resume your data at any step. This allows staff to fill in the incident report over multiple breaks without blocking off a significant portion of their time to do this.
QUASR, at its core, believes that an incident management system is an essential knowledge repository for the healthcare organization to learn from and disseminate information over. So transparency is one of the critical considerations of the design with suitable mechanisms to protect sensitive data when the need arises.
Finally, QUASR aims to keep the application simple in appearance and manner. The bottom line consideration for every element added into QUASR is the amount of training each user would need to use that element effectively. We have designed the user interface in line with some of the social applications familiar to us. This allows us, the users, to quickly adopt and start using QUASR with minimal training efforts.
We will be covering some of these features like pseudo-anonymity or sensitive incidents in individual blog posts in the future. So do watch this blog for more information.
Meanwhile, feel free to contact us or drop us a note if you need further information on any of these topics in particular or QUASR in general!
When we brainstormed the QUASR Lite design, we had a list of features for another version that’s slightly more advanced than Lite but not as involved as the Premium version. Even amidst our customers and prospects, we understand Lite is a little too simple for their process because they have had a computerized system in place for a while and are familiar with the advantages of having one. They need to upgrade but are not ready to set aside budgets or time for enterprise implementation.
So we built QUASR Basic to give you a flavor for what the enterprise system can do for you without having to go through full implementation. There are limitations, of course. In this post, allow us to introduce QUASR Basic to you.
QUASR Basic is Lite with an automated workflow
QUASR Basic is Lite with a workflow. It does not have all Premium version features and will probably remain that way for more time. BASIC and Premium target different types of organizations.
BASIC targets single/independent hospitals, which are:
1) accustomed to having a system in place.
2) using Lite for a while and want to graduate their process.
3) Enterprise-ready users who wish to try QUASR before taking on an enterprise implementation.
I hope we convinced you to read on, as this might be just what you need at your org right now.
What do we mean by a workflow anyway? In Lite, when you report an incident, the system doesn’t do much apart from saving it to a database and ensuring the data’s integrity. In BASIC, however, a few things happen: the system triggers an email to a pre-designated group of Quality Managers as soon as you report an incident.
The incident details collected also contain additional information such as the Supervisor for the incident, a team of investigators, a group of people to sign off on the incident etc. Each of these is a stage in the incident lifecycle. The Supervisor assigned is then required to perform the review and fill in the SBAR. Similarly, upon quality review completion, the investigation report can be updated and so on. This linearizing sequence of events in the incident lifecycle is what we call the “workflow”.
There’s more to QUASR Basic compared to QUASR Lite
But that’s not all of it either. There are more things under the hood in BASIC as compared to Lite. Flags assigned to incidents in Lite are merely indicators. They help you identify or classify incidents at a glance. However, in BASIC, you can use Flags to include pre-designated people in the incident loop. They’d automatically get notifications and access to the incident details.
Similarly, you can add other users to the incident and notify them of the occurrence – voluntarily. These might be other department heads or an HR supervisor or a Line supervisor instead of the department supervisor. These users would otherwise not have access to the incident or its details.
One last thing to highlight about Basic would be the “Sensitive Incidents” feature. We will write a detailed note on sensitive incidents in another post in the future. But for now, sensitive incidents are a type of flag that limits the access to the incidents to a predetermined group of users – Quality Managers, investigators and other management level users. QUASR does not have an opinion on how or when to use this flag. We leave it to our customers to use it as they see fit in their organization.
QUASR Basic vs QUASR Premium
Lastly, as I mentioned, BASIC is Lite with automated workflow.
But how does Basic compare to Premium?
Premium targets a group of institutions as opposed to independent hospitals or providers. A group has other requirements in terms of uniformity of process across their participant hospitals. They tend to prefer a single cluster implementation where the group management can get their dashboard with the essential information they need about the overall incident performance.
BASIC, on the other hand, does not support a cluster implementation. There are other differences in terms of support access, implementation, customization provisions in Premium that aren’t available in Basic. For more information, check our pricing page, and it’d be able to give you even more clarity on both these versions and options.
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” – A quote often attributed to Nobel winning Physicist Albert Einstein.
Incident Management process is often quite simple. The process provides a lot of information beyond incidents themselves and are essential inputs for overall clinical risk management as well. In many cases, the knowledge that the incident management process is a first step to overall risk management is sufficient to drive us into analysis paralysis mode. Risk management is a very complex topic and has far too many factors in its implementation. We, at QUASR, have insights into clinical risk management and we will eventually integrate QUASR to provide this option for our clients. In this post, we want to address some of the common complications in implementing an incident management system and our solutions.
QUASR follows an industry-standard workflowfor incident management. We implement a simple workflow and we are pretty proud of that fact. We believe we have achieved the simplest possible standard workflow that also captures the essence of incident management itself. However, during enterprise implementations, clients usually need quite a bit of convincing as to why this simple workflow is usually a good place for their needs. From our experience, this happens in two cases: when the clients have a legacy system that they have used for a while and are looking to keep the same process. Or they are looking to map their existing manual flow as-is into the new system. Both these approaches, frankly, are inefficient. Let us explain.
Legacy System Hangover
Systems that were built at least a decade back qualify as legacy systems. Any reasonably newer system might not have the issues that we are going to discuss here. For newer systems, the IT team was likely asked to implement their manual process as is! In software circles, there is an inside joke – “some unexplained bugs are actually features.”.
On a more serious note, systems that were implemented a long time back don’t fully take advantage of all the technological developments of recent times. Some of their design decisions could have been technology driven rather than user driven simply because it would be prohibitively difficult to implement differently.
A newer system built on more recent technologies doesn’t suffer from the same limitations. And hence it is possible to achieve more elegant solutions or workflows than wasn’t possible in a legacy system. That said, if we carried forward the legacy system as is, we might not fully utilize all the enhancements that technology offers us.
Mapping Manual Process to Digital Process
Since many of our customers are implementing their first digital system for incident management, this is the typical set of issues we face while onboarding and customizations. Many things we do manually, do not scale well to digital systems as such. And we all have seen examples of this: have you ever tried to collect all people interested in paying for a gift to a colleague? We send out an excel sheet and each person returns a sheet of their own and we merge them manually?
That’s exactly what we’d do before emails. We’d just go person to person, find out if they’d contribute and write it down in a piece of paper. But we all do know how inefficient that is, right? If we have to do the same thing today, we should probably set up a google form that each of the participant fills out and you get an excel sheet at the end of it. Same data is collected but far less work needs to be done by the person trying to collect it. The second option is a more digital native way of solving that problem. Incident management, incidentally, is full of such problems.
A typical example we often get as a customization request is to include additional workflow steps: include HoD as part of the workflow. Yes, we understand why you’d want to do that. But in many cases and as many of our customers agree too, this step is an FYI for the person involved. In a manual system, the HoD had no way of knowing what was happening unless you intentionally ran things by them. But digital systems aren’t really like that. Online systems are even lesser so. You’d just need to notify them in these cases.
In QUASR, we solve this problem by automatically having HoDs in the loop for all incidents in their department. You don’t need to do this additionally. However, we do not notify them every single time. EMail based notifications have become so common that we mindlessly mark things to read or archive them even without reading them. And we do not want to add to the inbox clutter either. So the HoDs just have to login periodically and they’d be updated on all the active incidents in their department. But unless we explain this, most of the users don’t see the solution. They are wondering how to implement an additional step in the workflow because that’s what they do in the manual flow.
Another example is typically around data collection fields. Many clients request adding quite a few descriptive fields whereas these aren’t very useful for systematic analysis. Descriptive data necessitates quality managers or investigators to spend time reading and understanding much information. But there is another downside: lack of sufficient information. Some people can describe an incident in vivid detail while others tend to write very little. Situations like these can be avoided by collecting quantifiable, standardized data instead. This, too, is an artifact of using paper based forms.
In paper based forms, it is impractical to collect incident type specific information for every incident type we want to track. So we end up with a few generic descriptive boxes for the users to fill up. However, adopting the same to a digital system does not allow you to utilize the full power of a digitalized solution.
Adopt Digitally Native Solutions
We just saw a few reasons why users typically have difficult-to-use, complex workflows in a digital system. But it’s not entirely their fault. As service providers, our first mantra is “Customer is always right!”. Blindly following the mantra, however, does very little to help the customer. While the customers know what they want, it is our duty to explain and clarify how best to provide what they want. Users tend to get carried away at the flexibility and try to plan for a future well ahead. It is worth remembering that technology evolves faster than our processes. So it is not very useful to plan far ahead into the future but plan for medium to short term only.
Enhancing software solutions are often quite simple and needn’t be as expensive either. Hence it is better to implement enhancements when the need arises rather than implement them all at once. Besides, having a digital native solution allows us to adapt to a digitalized workflow better – especially moving from a legacy or a paper-based system. Once we have acclimatized to a digitalized solution, we are better suited to decide how we need to enhance our systems in the future.
In the healthcare industry, incident reporting is an important task that records all the unusual events occurring at hospitals, nursing homes, and other medical facilities. An incident report is a formal report written by practitioners, nurses, or other staff members to inform facility administrators of incidents that allow the risk management team to consider changes that might prevent similar incidents. The forms used for incident reports are either paper forms or electronic.
Despite all the advances in medical technologies, Incident management remains a paper-based manual process in many hospitals. We understand that multiple factors drive these decisions. We talk about the effects of a paper-based vs a digital system on the incident reporting process here.
The first knock of a transition from paper medical records to electronic come after the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) 2009. This law encouraged healthcare providers in the United States to digitize internal record systems and develop a centralized database so that doctors, physicians, and nurses can easily access health records.
However, moving from a paper-based system to a paperless one isn’t that simple and easy. That’s why many healthcare facilities haven’t gone completely paperless even after a decade of modern record system. They might be trying to avoid a few hurdles, but in reality, they are facing multiple challenges daily with the paper-based method, such as:
Ineffective Data Presentation
Missing Audit trail and tracing
Prone to error
Difficult to analyze
Therefore, healthcare facilities required fast, secure, and quick incident reporting. In short, they need an automated incident reporting system. But, as of now, only two-thirds of hospitals have focused on automation.
Create-Track-Monitor Incidents using Excel
We have been working with healthcare facilities for years now, so we duly understand that automation isn’t an easy task. It is an expensive and technical process that not all hospitals can adopt.
We are here to help you with an alternative, that won’t cost you a dime. A free, reliable, and effective incident management system for medical facilities— Excel reporting.
For hospitals that are not yet ready to dive into software systems for incident reporting, using Excel is an inexpensive and reliable option, as it can quickly get you off the ground. In this article, we’ll discuss how you can use Excel to maintain and track your incidents.
To manage all incidents in one place, and analyze them effectively, the quality manager needs to organize different sets of data to draw conclusive statistics. However, when incidents are recorded in papers, analyzing the data or locating patterns is a daunting task. Thus, a need for meaningful data emerges where data is easily readable and interpretable.
In a paper-based reporting, an incident description will be recorded like this:
“A Patient A was sleeping on his bed in Ward No. 2. While turning in his sleep, he fell from the bed. The attending nurse immediately rushed to him and helped him get back onto the bed and put the bed rails up. The patient did not sustain any injuries.”
Now, if same information is captured in structured format, it will look like this:
Incident Type: Patient fall Incident Subtype: Fell from bed Incident Location: Ward 2 Affected People: Patient A Injury: None
It is evident that the data recorded in the second style is easier to navigate, analyze and interpret. Therefore, the way you record data makes a huge difference in the analytical process.
If you are using paper forms for reporting and managing incidents, we have even eased your work by creating an Incident Report Excel Template along with a process to custom create incident reports in Excel.
How to structure your data
When you want to gain insightful information from an incident report, you have to record every minute detail in it. However, the amount of report details depends upon your organization’s size, patient safety goals, claim frequency, and other relevant factors. In a hospital incident report, it is essential to add the following details:
Incident occurrence date
The well-informed incident report needs basic information such as the date and time of the incident. This is one of the most important pieces of information especially useful to calculate statistics and performance.
Location of the Incident
Specifically, mention the location of the incident along with the particular area within the hospital—for example, patient X fall in Ward no. 2 near the bed. When you use Excel, it is a good idea to make the Location field into a dropdown field. Generate a list of all possible locations, from the lift lobby to OT, and select from the values, rather than typing it as text. This helps you to convert ‘Location’ into a measurable field and you can generate statistics out of it, such as, “What is the most prone location for a fall?”.
Type of the Incident
This is the key information that will help you in analyzing and processing your data, as well as generating your statistics for the management. You can categorize the incidents as Medication Error, Patient Fall, Equipment Damage, Patient Identification, etc. When you use Excel, it is a good idea to make the Incident type field into a dropdown field. Create a list of all the incident types you want to capture and select from the values, rather than typing it as text. This helps you to convert ‘Incident Type’ into a measurable field and you can generate statistics, such as, “What is the most common incident in my hospital last year?”.
Parties Involved in the Incident
The name and contact details of all the parties involved in the incident to follow up. If there are witnesses available to the incident, it will be helpful to add their statements in your report. While writing witness statements, focus on the following attributes—specific details provided related to the incident, use quotation marks to frame their statements, note witnesses’ location at the time of the incident, and how they are related to the incident.
Detailed Incident Description
The incident description is provided by the person who reported the incident. This can be as detailed as it can get, as more the information in hand, the better it is to investigate it further.
Once you have all the information from the reporter, you can track the incident in excel by recording all the follow-up discussions, comments given by Supervisor or other managers all in one single row in excel!
Risk Assessment Score
Whether you use a 5×5 Risk matrix or a SAC scoring of 1 to 4, you can enter the severity risk score against the incident, again in the same row!
Except for minor incidents, everything else will most likely go through a root cause analysis and investigation process. It is a good practice to maintain a list of all the Contributing factors, (either London Protocol or you can follow your hospital guidelines) and select from the values, rather than typing it as text. This helps you to convert ‘Contributing factors’ into a measurable field and you can generate useful statistics, such as, “What is the top contributing factor for my incidents?”.
What is Meaningful Data?
Meaningful data is, in simple terms, usable statistics and actionable insights that can be used to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of your process. The meaningful data answers numerous aggregated questions, provide you useful insights without many efforts
How many fall incidents happened last month?
How many medication errors occurred last year?
What percentage of incidents are still open?
What is the most common occurrence?
Which location is prone to more falls?
As we have cleared in the above example that paper-based recorded data can’t help you find aggregated results without spending hours or days of effort. But, with excel, you can utilize the features such as a drop-down list and data filters to derive this meaningful information quickly.
Download our ready-to-use Excel template
If you don’t know how to turn a vanilla Excel spreadsheet into an incident report sheet, do not fret! Download our ready-to-use Incident Manager Template. The template contains all the information that you minimally need to capture and provides some incidents for reference. You can customize the template to suit your needs, especially the parent list of incident types, list of departments, and statuses. In the following sections, we also explain how you can do this.
However, if you want to build your own custom incident manager spreadsheet from scratch, read more as we walk you through the process.
Customize your Incident Manager Excel template
How to Create a Drop-down for Columns?
Drop-down is a very useful Excel feature where you can sort relevant information based on your requirements. For instance, using our template you can easily sort information based on incident type and contributing factors. However, to create a custom drop-down list, you can follow these steps:
Select the cells that you want to contain the lists.
On the ribbon, click DATA > Data Validation.
In the dialog, set Allow to List.
Click in Source, type the text or numbers (separated by commas, for a comma-delimited list) that you want in your drop-down list, and click OK.
The filter function allows users to easily extract matching records from a larger set of data based on certain criteria. Suppose you want to know how many open incident cases were present in Ward No. 2, our incident template will immediately show you—just follow these instructions:
Select any cell within the range.
Click on Data > Filter.
Next, select the column header arrow.
Now, you can choose between Text Filters or Number Filters.
For eg. To know the number of open incidents, you should select the Status field and select ‘Open’ (unselect ‘Closed’). To know the number of such open incidents in Ward 2, you should select the Location field and select ‘Ward 2’. Now you have the narrowed down list of Open incidents from Ward2.
How to Create a PivotTable?
In Excel, you can use PivotTable to calculate, summarise and analyze data present in your report. Additionally, you can easily compare and find trends in your data. With our template, you can create Statistics on Incident Types or by departments or by status.
PivotTable works a little different depending on what platform you are using to run Excel, but the simple way to create PivotTable is:
Select a cell where you want to create PivotTable.
Select Insert > PivotTable.
Under Choose the data that you want to analyze, you can Select a table or range.
Verify the cell range in Table/Range.
Under Choose where you want the PivotTable report to be placed, you can select a new worksheet or an existing one to add PivotTable and select OK.
You can add fields to your PivotTable, click on the field name checkbox in the PivotTables Fields pane.
How to Refresh PivotTable?
When you add new information to our pre-made worksheet, you need to refresh the PivotTable to provide updated statistics to you. To refresh PivotTable:
Click anywhere on the PivotTable to appear the PivotTable Tools ribbon.
Select Analyze > Options.
Go to the Data tab, check the Refresh data when opening the file box.
How to Create Graphs?
To better analyze incident data, you can convert it into a graph and chart with our template. The graph can be created in Excel as:
Select a cell.
Choose a graph from the nine graph and chart options.
Highlight your data and click on ‘Insert.’
Adjust data’s layout and colors.
As per your requirements, change the size of the graph and axis labels.
Get started today by downloading this Incident Report Templatewe created for you to easily start managing your incidents. The template contains all the minimal information that you need to capture. You can customize this template to suit your needs, especially customizing the parent list of incident types, contributing factors, list of locations, and departments.
QUASR Lite is the simplest online incident managing software you have been looking for. The main advantage QUASR Lite brings to you over vanilla excel sheets is that: we have built it specifically for hospital incident scenarios. We consolidated our experience working with many hospitals and created a starter tool that will grow with you as you mature into bigger and more involved processes. You’ll be able to attach evidence, share reports with selected staff or departments and notify senior management of serious incidents. Since it is digital, you can effortlessly search, sort, or churn statistics for those important management meetings.
QUASR Lite is aimed at organizations that are just getting started or wanting to digitize their incident management process. Whether you have a simple paper-form method or looking to create your own structure and process, QUASR Lite has you covered.
This article expounds on the effects of a paper-based vs a digital document system on the incident reporting process and the various aspects to consider when moving from a paper-based system to a digital system.
Despite all the advances in medical technologies, Incident management remains a paper-based manual process in many hospitals. We understand that multiple factors drive these decisions. There is no single reason why any hospital continues on a manual process.
Let us briefly describe the incident reporting process in a hospital. A reporter/witness has to fill in a paper form with as many details as possible. The quality team then reviews the report and collects other witness accounts and additional supporting information from the supervisor(s). Based on the data collected, the quality team performs risk assessment.
At this stage, the quality team also decides whether the incident requires a more detailed, structured investigation. In cases where an investigation is not needed, the record is closed and filed for archival. But when an investigation is required, the quality team identifies a team of investigators: a group consisting of just the quality team or a team of individuals from across functions. This is the standard process followed in most hospitals, with some having variations to cater to their operations. This process can be followed either manually, which we call a paper-based system, or digitally, with the help of a software.
In simple terms, a paper-based system is one where information is kept on paper, rather than on a computer.
Let us take the example of a hospital that uses a paper-based system for incident reporting. As you can see above, in every stage of an incident, the incident form (paper) is passed around to various stakeholders. Each stakeholder gets a copy of the incident form based on which they create their reports. The quality team collects all these individual reports and then files them together as part of the incident report. Each step involves moving paper, tracking them carefully across many staff. The process usually takes a few weeks until closure.
With paper forms stored in files and folders, there is no simple way to locate a specific report involving a particular patient or generate statistics or identify any patterns. As a quality manager, suppose you want to analyze incidents from the past year and develop a set of guidelines or device process improvements so that some incidents do not happen in the future. There is no easy way to do this when you deal with paper forms. By practice, the quality team identifies common incidents and recommendations for preventing those. But to effect the changes, the quality manager has to collect conclusive evidence and statistics to highlight the pattern. With paper-based incident reports, this is a few weeks of effort to collect the required data and present it to the management.
Keeping track of paper documents is not only a hassle but a waste of time and resources. Additionally, the data collected is relatively low quality in nature due to legibility issues. Safe storage from various hazards, securing from unauthorized staff only increases the complexity.
In simple terms, a digital system is a system that stores the data in a searchable format on computerized storage. This storage could be on a local computer, on a server or the cloud. A Searchable format can be anything ranging from a simple Word document or an Excel sheet, a text document, or an elaborate record-keeping system on the cloud.
The same incident process: collaborating with multiple stakeholders, investigation reports, gathering statistics and identifying patterns become far more straightforward with a digital system. It is also simple to collect and manage all types of incidents – major or minor – leading to identifying issues that otherwise go unreported.
The quality of the data collected is better, and it is effortless to avoid duplication. The data may be accessed from anywhere while enforcing sufficient levels of security and authorization. It is also possible to restrict access to specific data and get visibility to all the modifications made. Moving to a digital system saves time, effort, resources and enables collaboration. It also helps improve communication and brings in better accountability.
How to choose a digital system?
At this point, the motivations to go digital are quite apparent. The critical question, then, is – how does one choose the right digital system? Our answer is: start small. The transformation process is quite involved and can be daunting if we accounted for all the factors in the first attempt. There are also factors about data storage location and format to use. Our recommendation is to start with the most comfortable and familiar format: Excel Sheets. Manage the sheets on the local laptop/desktop or a network shared folder. Just doing this is already a successful first step to the transition to a digital system.
It is essential to build a habit of collecting the required data digitally using the newly devised system. It is easier to improve the system and the process to collect all the right data with regular use. Having the right data is the first step to identifying the system that suits the process in place. While digital data storage comes with many benefits, there are downsides based on the actual system in place.
To understand this better, let us take a case where we use Excel sheets for managing incidents. For all the benefits that Excel offers, it is quite challenging to “organize” data effectively. Often it is possible to end up with multiple versions of a file shared over emails leading to merging efforts. Further, charting or pivoting the data requires significant knowledge and skill with Excel itself.
Do watch this blog for an article on managing incident data effectively using Excel sheets.
We can address some of these complexities by using other tools like Google Forms or repurposing project management apps to manage incidents. For the technically savvy, bug tracking systems commonly used in software development companies are also a good starting point for incident management systems.
To conclude, the benefits of a digital systemfar outweigh the perceived convenience of a paper-based system in almost all aspects. However, transitioning to a digital system need not be a daunting task if it is taken one step at a time. Picking the right tools to aid in the transition by leveraging familiarity is an excellent way to get started quickly.
When we launched QUASR a couple of years back, our motivation was to create an enterprise incident management software specifically for healthcare organizations in this region (South-East Asia). Having over a decade of experience working with the big guys in this region, we have an excellent understanding of what the big solutions did to service the big guys as well. In some sense, we were uniquely positioned to generate value. But we also figured that the big organizations are well serviced and tended to have very complex requirements on their tools. So our entire vision was to bridge the gap for medium-sized hospitals. To date, all our customers say they are pleased about their implementation of QUASR, which is unique to their organization and processes.
In early 2020, the pandemic hit. The pandemic meant a lot of the healthcare organizations had to start working remotely too. Much non-frontline work had to go remote in an environment that is traditionally not trained to work remote. While our solution is perfect for organizations to take their quality process online and remote, our solution wasn’t armed to help the smaller or niche, healthcare providers. Some of these providers have not evolved to have their quality processes, have a paper-form based flow but do not have volumes to warranty a separate software or are very early to benefit from even a mid-sized solution like QUASR. The features in QUASR, though, strategic and straightforward, is sometimes far more involved and complex for an organization that is just getting started on this path.
That’s the genesis story for QUASR Lite. QUASR Lite is aimed at organizations that are just getting started on an incident management process. Whether you have a simple paper-form method or looking to create your own structure and process, Lite has you covered. QUASR Lite is unopinionated in that it does not enforce a workflow.
What is QUASR Lite?
QUASR Lite is an online incident repository. It is a simple data capture tool and allows you to capture the incident data in a structured format. It makes your life easy to gather incident statistics and generate reports.
You could very well do the same with an excel sheet. And we would have to agree. But the main advantage Lite brings to you over vanilla excel sheets is that: we have thought this one out for you. We have built it specifically for hospital incident scenarios. We consolidated our experience working with many hospitals and created a starter tool that will grow with you as you mature to bigger and more involved processes.
Who is QUASR Lite for?
Lite perfectly suits small hospitals, clinics, speciality hospitals, nursing homes and care centers and individual hospitals, that are either:
✅New to incident management
✅Looking forward to digitalizing their incident data;
✅Looking to get started with a starter tool and graduate to more complex tools along the way.
Lite takes all these scenarios into account. There are some opinionated decisions we have made in Lite, though. Lite is primarily meant as a tool for the Quality Management team. So we limited the number of user licenses to 5 per account. Ideally, 5 seats are plenty enough to have quality managers and even senior management from your hospital.
Also, since Lite is for a closed team of Quality Managers, we don’t have email notifications baked in. We believe that if it is your primary tool for work, you might not want to be notified of every small action. However, this might change in the future. There are other uniquely designed features that we’ll go over in individual posts over the next couple of weeks.
Join the community
Lite is an evolving product. The first version which is taking trial requests now is the first feature-complete version. We will be adding an overall roadmap of features to Lite over the next several quarters. But more importantly, we believe that its users will drive the roadmap for Lite.
We built the enterprise version of QUASR, ‘QUASR Premium’ the same way – based on customers’ direct feedback, their specific needs and requests. So we don’t see why Lite is any different. So if you want a product that suits your process, get on the train right now and help build the product you need.